Intelligent Use Interfaces

Man is a social animal. To achieve this it first intelligently organizes its own body and this way becomes a he or a she. Then they intelligently organizes their shes and hes own intelligent organizations for themselves into spirits and their spirits help them to understand they form a single multibody intelligent society. Then they discover the limits of their human intelligence and need some form of assistance to individually and collectively adequately behave. This lead to science and technologies and to politics and power.

When man discovers something he cannot further on survive without, one says he has met a singularity. This was the case with his local interfaces to express feelings farther and farther on: gestures and mimics, then language, then scripting.

The last main singularity was when Socrates, Plato and Aristotle came and disagreed over new technologies. Socrates was good at extracting knowledge from people through questions. He disagreed with the new technology of writing. He thought that this would kill the human thinking if one attempted to bury it in written. Plato shown that this was not the human thinking that was written, but the human ideas, some snapshots of the thinking. Then Aristotle shown the incredible use one could make of this: to make the written ideas to become alive by themselves, traveling the world and being discussed and rethought by many, but even to generate new ideas through what he called syllogism, i.e. inventing logic.

Syllogism is "...a discourse in which certain (specific) things having been supposed, something different from the things supposed results of necessity because these things are so." Architectonics is the science of politics the art of which is to use it to command free men.

Syllogism and its dialectic logic, replacing feelings, is the way free men have related together ever since.

Technology is changing this: it facilitates the free men interconnections and provides

• standalone intermediary peripheral computer assisted intelligence.
• the capacity to deal with far more simultaneous connections.

This changes the human society architectonics. This is a new singularity one names "technological singularity".

Back in the 70s two people have understood two main consequences:

• Alvin Toffler who published in 1970 the "Future Shock": "shattering stress and disorientation" by information overload, due to a personal perception of "too much change in too short a period of time".

• Norman Hardy who designed the Tymshare/Tymnet software technology and initiated and mastered the "agorics" as a software concept.

The definition of an agorism we will give is "an aggregation of dyktèmes from which a coherent polylectic tensegrity will emerge. A dyktème is a meshed mème. When the emergence results in new different dyktèmes they are qualified of intellition, i.e. an ignored information that makes sense".

The network component that deals with intellition is called the "Intelligent Use Interface". Its role is receive as "capta" the "data" that have been sent on the network by another party, to intellitively process them, and to present them to the users as "tracta". When compared with the OSI model one can say that the IUI role corresponds to an intelligent polyrelationnal presentation layer six. Polyrelationnal means it can network its active content processing with other IUIs of the network.

It should usually be implemented as a (virtual) front-end of the interconnected processors or as OPES Network Entwined System (ONES). If the IUI are treated on an equal basis footing, one will use the term of "Masters and Masters" model. Their applications are executed in as a protocol (ASAP) mode.

If the IUI is under the user direct supervision the resulting network system will be called "interplus", i.e. inter-presentation-layer-on-the-user-side.